During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
See what I’m getting at? JavaScript code is fundamentally a “userland” thing. The code you ship is accessible to the user to modify and fuck about with however they wish.
，这一点在heLLoword翻译官方下载中也有详细论述
（三）展示侮辱性标语、条幅等物品的；
Что думаешь? Оцени!
华纳兄弟表示，若Netflix修改报价后，董事会仍倾向于派拉蒙的收购方案，那么华纳兄弟则有权终止与Netflix的协议。华纳兄弟称，在此之前，与Netflix的合并协议仍然有效，华纳兄弟董事会将继续建议股东批准与Netflix的交易。